Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
A. Reflect on your experience in the Leadership and Communication course by doing the following:
1. Provide a brief overview of your understanding of your Energy Graph from the Learning Report, including two personal strengths and two personal challenges that relate to your working style.
Note: Consider discussing your intensity level (Extreme, Effortless, Deliberate, Stress) in your main dynamics—Explore, Excite, Examine, and Execute—and how they relate to your strengths and challenges.
2. Describe your experience(s) of conversations as they relate to the laws of conversation and the four levels of the conversation meter.
3. Discuss your strategies for being a successful student, including how you will incorporate your strengths and address your challenges.
4. Reflect on your overall experience in the course and how it applies to two of the following: academic activities, professional career, or personal life.
B. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
QVP Task 3: Reflection Paper
- Reflect on your experience in the Leadership and Communication course by doing the following:
A1. Working Style:
According to my energy graph, I am effortless in explore and execute, deliberate in examine, and stress level on excite. This corresponds to my character as my strengths include my curiosity to try new things or to gather more knowledge as well as the initiative to get things done and my weakness was that I tend to stick to an initial conclusion firmly which isn’t always beneficial. I also struggled with excessive company, finding myself frustrated easily drained.
Clark and colleagues (2019) state that communication aims to cultivate positive relationships and to develop understanding. Furthermore, a crucial part of a conversation is that initiative of one to start it and the engagement of the other in order to maximize the exchange (Clark et al., 2019). My learning of the laws of conversation, specifically of bio-reactions and the four levels of conversation meter allowed me to assess my interactions. My conversations mostly depend upon the company and other factors such as mood. Often, I do freeze bio reaction and choose to appease people during times where opinions differ. Following this, I struggle to engage in meaningful conversations successfully. While this might seem that I adopt a pretence level ………………. Click the purchase icon Above to but the full solution at $10
QVP1-QVP TASK 3: REFLECTION PAPER