(SOLUTION) NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT

$10.00

Category:

Description

I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT

Throughout this course, you have reviewed Learning Resources on various body systems and completed i-Human Patients Assignments for particular systems. For this i-Human Patients Assignment, you connect the knowledge and skills you gained from each individual assessment to perform a comprehensive head-to-toe physical examination.

Note: You must pass the Week 9 Assignment to pass the course.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

  • By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will assign an i-Human Patients case for this Assignment. Note: Please see the Course Announcements section of the classroom for your i-Human Patients Assignment.
  • Review this week’s Learning Resources. Also review Learning Resources from previous weeks as needed.
  • Access and review this week’s i-Human Patients Case Study Assignment.

Assignment

As you interact with this week’s i-Human Patients patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human Patients, refer to the i-Human Graduate Programs Help link within the i-Human Patients platform.

Note: You must achieve a total score of at least 80% in order to pass this Assignment. You must pass the Week 9 Assignment to pass the course. Carefully review the Assignment and the rubric to be sure you fully understand the requirements of this Assignment. 

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 9

Upload your PDF from i-Human Patients to submit this Assignment.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK9Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6512_Week 9_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_6512_Week 9_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
History: Complete an appropriate health history. (Scores are automatically calculated in the i-Human platform.)

20 pts

Excellent
Achieves a score of 90–100%

15 pts

Good
Achieves a score of 80–89%

10 pts

Fair
Achieves a score of 70–79%

5 pts

Poor
Achieves a score of 60–69%

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Achieves a score of 59% or below
20 pts
Physical Exam: Complete an appropriate physical exam. (Scores are automatically calculated in the i-Human platform.)

20 pts

Excellent
Achieves a score of 90–100%

15 pts

Good
Achieves a score of 80–89%

10 pts

Fair
Achieves a score of 70–79%

5 pts

Poor
Achieves a score of 60–69%

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Achieves a score of 59% or below
20 pts
EMR Documentation History of Present Illness: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional Language; 4.) Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Subjective findings only

10 pts

Excellent
Complete HPI meeting all 5 criteria.

8 pts

Good
4 requirements are met.

6 pts

Fair
3 requirements are met.

4 pts

Poor
1–2 requirements are met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements are met.
10 pts
EMR Documentation Subjective Data Document Current Medications, Review of System: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional Language; 4.) Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Subjective findings only

10 pts

Excellent
Complete HPI meeting all 5 criteria.

8 pts

Good
4 requirements are met.

6 pts

Fair
3 requirements are met.

4 pts

Poor
1–2 requirements are met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements are met.
10 pts
EMR Documentation Objective Data Document Physical Exam Findings: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional Language; 4.) Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Objective findings only

10 pts

Excellent
Complete HPI meeting all 5 criteria.

8 pts

Good
4 requirements are met.

6 pts

Fair
3 requirements are met.

4 pts

Poor
1–2 requirements are met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements are met.
10 pts
Key Findings: Organize the key findings with the most important first and least important last.

5 pts

Excellent
The key findings are complete and appropriately organized.

4 pts

Good
The key findings are complete but the organization is not correct.

3 pts

Fair
There are 1–2 key findings missing or organized inappropriately.

2 pts

Poor
There are 3 key findings missing and organization is incorrect.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
There are more than 3 key findings missing and organization is incorrect.
5 pts
Problem Statement: Document a brief and accurate problem statement using professional language that includes the following: 1.) Name or initials, age; 2.) Chief complaint; 3.) Positive and negative subjective findings; 4.) Positive and negative objective findings.

5 pts

Excellent
All requirements are met.

4 pts

Good
3 requirements are met.

3 pts

Fair
2 requirements are met.

2 pts

Poor
1 requirement is met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements are met.
5 pts
Management Plan: Use the expert diagnosis provided to create a pertinent, comprehensive, evidenced-based management plan. Address the following criteria in the plan: 1.) Diagnostic tests; 2.) Medications (write out a complete order, even for OTC meds); 3.) Suggested consults/referrals; 4.) Patient education; 5.) Follow-up, including time interval and specific symptoms to prompt a return visit sooner; 6.) Provide rationales for each intervention and include references to support your plan. Clinical practice guidelines should be utilized as applicable.

15 pts

Excellent
All requirements are met.

13 pts

Good
5 requirements are met.

10 pts

Fair
4 requirements are met.

7 pts

Poor
1-3 requirements are met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No requirements are met.
15 pts
References and Format: Current APA citations for references in management plan. Use of clinical practice guidelines when applicable.

5 pts

Excellent
0–1 errors Clinical practice guidelines used when applicable.

4 pts

Good
2–3 errors Clinical practice guidelines used when applicable.

3 pts

Fair
4–5 errors Clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable.

2 pts

Poor
6–7 errors Clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
More than 7 errors; clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable.
5 pts
Total Points: 100